Remember that it’s quite possible to violate these norms without being a bad person. Many people have different levels of experience, knowledge, and feelings in social justice and radical activism and all participants should respect and embrace this diversity. 5. Procedural norms (for Q&A after talks; some are specific to the hand/finger system). Home » Modules » Effective Communication » Effective Communication High School » Guidelines for a Respectful Class Discussion. Hold back questions until after the break. Respect, diversity and good working relationships. Please try to speak … Don’t use unnecessarily offensive examples. RESPECT CONFIDENTIALITY. When someone makes a point, repeat what you heard, 3) Please ask yourself "Why am I Talking? If a team member is experiencing a challenging problem, provide Empathy.Next, discuss the problem and set a Goal for creating a solution. Please try to speak from experience, speak for yourself, and actively listen to each other. The E.G.O. Be cautious about pestering the speaker during the break or after the talk (they may need to rest). If the chair violates the norms, feel free to say so then or afterwards. Hand/finger system [optional]: To raise a new question at any point, raise your hand until the chair acknowledges you and adds you to the list. Another respectful communication strategy for healthy teamwork is known as the E.G.O. Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014: Regulation 10. Try not to let your question (or your answer) run on forever. Many people from different backgrounds have different definitions of what it means to be an "activist" or "radical." Many of us will have different opinions on matters. It’s OK to question the presuppositions of a project or an area, but discussions in which these questions dominate can be unhelpful. 2. Respectful discussion guidelines are helpful for keeping things focused too. Our job as facilitators is to help us have a good discussion where all views can be voiced in a safe and respectful environment. To follow up on an existing question by someone else, raise your finger. If there’s time, take a 3-5 minute break before Q&A (for resting, leaving, and formulating questions). Assume good faith in your fellow comrades. David Chalmers has put together a wonderful list of guidelines for respectful philosophical discussion. implicit gender biases) when calling on questioners and applying these norms. Don’t present objections as flat dismissals (leave open the possibility that there’s a response). ", We have a limited amount of time for discussion and to accomplish the tasks before us. Object to theses, don’t object to people. Don’t start side conversations parallel to the main discussion. 5. If it’s more comfortable to do so, it’s also fine to quietly point out violations after the seminar (or to tell the chair who can talk to the offender). Conversation Guidelines It is by no means easy to hold beliefs for which you would be willing to die, and yet to remain open to new insights; but it is precisely such a combination of commitment and inquiry that constitutes religious maturity (Ian Barbour) Expectations for eCircle Contributors Policing usually works better with a light touch. The facilitator nods and makes eye contact to indicate the person is now put on the list to speak, and then the person can put their hand down so it does not distract other discussion participants. Please try to speak from experience, speak for yourself, and actively listen to each other. 7. 5. To this end, the department has compiled a list of guidelines to facilitate discussion of this sort. Maximum two minutes per question (modified version: after two minutes, interruptions are OK). Help create a safe and inclusive space for everybody. 6. Strategies are required for supporting a workplace environment where everyone is treated with respect, fairness and dignity. It’s fine to negotiate these norms as a group in advance. (We’ve sometimes asked for volunteers to read each one off.) Whatever the context, it is helpful to structure such discussions in a way that defines boundaries for the process and provides some degree of closure within the classroom. Home; About. The guidelines below are intended primarily for oral philosophical discussion in formal settings: colloquia, conferences, seminars, classes, and so on. IV. Utilize the institution’s established guidelines for network etiquette in order to address respect between students and instructors. 3. 5. 1. People have the right to be involved in discussions and make informed decisions about their care, as described in making decisions about your care. 2. Despite their many shortcomings, they deserve your attention and respect during class discussions. Respectful behaviour displays personal integrity and professionalism, practices fairness and understanding, demonstrates respect for individual rights and differences and encourages accountability for one's actions. The ReSPECT process creates personalised recommendations for a person’s clinical care and treatment in a future emergency in which they are unable to make or express choices. Includes classroom discussion questions, writing assignments, and student activities. Establish a clear code of conduct for participants. Assume good faith in your fellow comrades. We’ve also shared them with our coalition partners as a useful resource. If you have a disagreement, wait for your turn to address it. Don’t use language that’s clearly oppressive or hurtful. Ask for consent before you share someone’s story or comment. But in many philosophical contexts, they are useful norms to have in place. If you see posts or comments that violate these guidelines, please report it so that we may remove it. And, as always, please inform organizers of inappropriate behavior immediately. In this post we will explain the best practices that help reduce risk, mitigate issues, and facilitate respectful online discussions between all parties. See the NYU guidelines for respectful discussion for a simplified and adapted version of this list. (I’ve certainly violated most of them myself.). Try not to be defensive when a violation is pointed out. 5. 6. If you are sharing data, please include your source for clarity and to help support the discussion with facts. Managers should: make sure the team have completed available training in relation to diversity, health and safety, discrimination, and bullying and harassment Meetings and topics can sometimes be challenging. Bio; Contact; CV; Site History; Site Map; Books. Next, establish some ground rules, like treating everyone with respect, no interrupting, and being succinct. Progressive Stack is a form of leading discussions which involves a facilitator keeping a list of names of people who wish to speak. 4. LEAN INTO DISCOMFORT. We hope that you will say what is on your mind. 8. If Unlikeable Joe posts a ridiculous comment to your class board, you absolutely must refrain from responding to Joe, as the owner of the comment. The specific norms are intended as means of facilitating more general norms of being respectful, constructive, and inclusive. Objections are fine, but it’s also always OK to be constructive, building on a speaker’s project or strengthening their position. 6. 2. EXAMPLE 1: Guidelines for Class Participation . Having a set of agreements will help ensure that your meetings are respectful and provide a safe place for everyone. The chair rather than the speaker should field questions (to avoid various biases). 9. Who said movement building can’t be fun? Meetings are more productive — and more fun — when the conversation includes everyone. Please respect these guidelines at all Sac DSA Events. In a talk, the speaker can ask the chair to suspend some norms (especially norms of constructiveness), though the chair needn’t agree. For grades 5-9. 8. 1. VI. Suggestions for addition, subtraction, and change are more than welcome. 2) Know whether you need to "step up" or "step back". 9. The Democratic Socialists of America is the largest socialist organization in the United States, with over 80,000 members. Don’t interrupt, turn to technology, or engage in private conversations while others are speaking. Please try to speak from experience, speak for yourself, and actively listen to each other. Don’t write anything that sounds angry or sarcastic, even as a joke, because without hearing your … ), 4) Please recognize and respect others feelings, background, and cultural differences. Letting comments slip by only makes the space less safe and increases the difficulty of building successful partnerships. Assume good faith in each other. When norms are violated, the chair is encouraged to gently point this out, and others should feel free to say something or to signal the chair. If you find yourself thinking that the project is worthless and there is nothing to be learned from it, think twice before asking your question. Ask permission to follow up your own question (modified version: ask permission for any follow-up after the first). Respect the chair’s enforcement of these norms. Following up your own question is usually fine (unless time is short), but follow-up rounds should usually be increasingly brief, and think twice about whether third and later rounds are really needed. Assume good faith in each other. In short discussion periods, or with a short time remaining, this may be difficult; disallowing fingers helps. Establish clear guidelines and terms of participation. PLEASE REVIEW DISCUSSION GUIDELINES ATTACHMENT BEFORE WRITING RESPONSE…STRICT GUIDELINES HAVE TO BE FOLLOWED TO RECEIVE FULL CREDIT!!! Remember, mistakes will be made, nobody is perfect. Raise one question per question (follow-ups are OK, but questions on different topics go to the back of the queue). Share responsibility for including all voices in the conversation. Approach. If there’s time, take a 3-5 minute break before Q&A (for resting, leaving, and formulating questions). On the other hand, if you don’t often speak up, we encourage you to do so now! It’s reasonable for chairs to apply the norms flexibly and context-sensitively, but watch out for reintroducing biases in doing so. Prioritize junior people in calling on questions (modified version: don’t prioritize senior people). Even objections can often be cast in a constructive way. 5. Please respect others by recognizing how often, much, and loud you’re speaking and whether or not you’re dominating conversation. Quality measure. Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Explaining Consciousness: The Hard Problem. 3. However, speaking while others are talking or adding comments when they cannot respond appropriately does not build community. 3. Avoid emoticons and “texting” writing. Then, explain the topic that’s up for discussion and ask … If someone who is of an oppressed group raises their hand, they go to the top of the list unless they have already contributed significantly to the discussion. It’s focussed on in-person discussion, e.g. In a 60-minute conversation there may be … Remember that philosophy isn’t a zero-sum game. (Partial exception for signalling norm violations to the chair.). Be willing to experience some discomfort in discussions, and learn from it as a team! These probably aren’t exceptionless categorical norms (there are situations in which it is appropriate to be disrespectful, destructive, and exclusive). 5) We have “one mic” so do not interrupt or speak while others are talking. (Related version: philosophy isn’t Fight Club.). 1. All this is a highly tentative work in progress. 1. The facilitator scans the group during discussion and if someone wishes to speak, they raise their hand and catch the facilitator’s eye. This is a great opportunity for people to get to know one another, building lasting friendships and relationships, to laugh, love, and build a movement. 3. Recognize that everyone has a piece of the truth, everybody can learn, and everybody has the ability to teach and share something. in seminars. guidelines for respectful, constructive, and inclusive philosophical discussion 1. Don’t dominate the discussion (partial exception for the speaker here!). 8. But a lot of it carries over very well to the internet– and, I think, would vastly improve the blogosphere if widely followed. Acknowledge points made by previous questioners. The following guidelines can help instructors facilitate classroom discussion around controversial issues. 1. You may also distribute guidelines as a discussion starter and decide as a class which ones to implement, or ask students to generate ideas together during class and create a classroom contract (Example 4) that students can sign and submit. 2. The intention of this regulation is to make sure that people using the service are treated with respect and dignity at all times while they are receiving care and treatment. This has been helpful at DSA and YDS meetings, especially when new people are present. You don’t need to keep pressing the same objection (individually or collectively) until the speaker says uncle. Acknowledge your interlocutor’s insights. Approach. Respectful discussions with parents about their smoking Suggested lines Broaching the subject of smoking with parents for the first time can be difficult, however once you become comfortable with your own language around the issue it becomes second nature. The chair rather than the speaker should field questions (to avoid various biases). While we all don’t have to agree on everything, we should respect our diversity of opinions. Encourage yourself and others to maintain a positive attitude, honor the work of others, avoid defensiveness, be open to legitimate critique and challenge oppressive behaviors in ways that help people grow. Guidelines Anticipate and enjoy moments of silence. 3. Follow-ups should pick up directly on the existing discussion, rather than being tangentially or distantly related (for follow-ups of that sort, raise your hand). 4. Encourage students to work collaboratively in developing a respectful environment. You can read these before meetings and forums. Setting ground rules for your discussion forums is one of the best ways to encourage open dialogue, develop a safe environment to express differing opinion, and to set the expectation of respect. 4. 4. It’s OK to ask a question that you think may be unsophisticated or uninformed. 6. A teaching guide for the virtue of respect. Even when an objection is destructive with respect to a position, it often helps to find a positive insight suggested by the objection. 3. 1. Step back to leave space for others to voice their opinions and feelings. A difficult class discussion may come up in any subject, but particularly in classes where social and political issues are a part of the curriculum. Assume good faith in each other. Rather, if someone who has not spoken raises their hand, they go to the top of the list. Finally, identify the reasonable Options available to solve the problem; choose which option to use and move forward. Listen respectfully. Assume that stories and comments shared at meetings should remain private. The chair should keep in mind the likelihood of various biases (e.g. However, the facilitator does not simply write a list of names in the order that people raise their hand. When someone makes a point, repeat what you heard, summarize, and ask clarifying questions like “did you mean X” or “what makes you say that” to get more information. After someone shares his thoughts, allow for a time of silence to let the thoughts soak in. The chair should try to pace things so that everyone who has a question can ask a question. Please, refrain from using acronyms or complicated language that could exclude others. What is a Difficult Class Discussion? Thanks to many philosophers for their suggestions so far. Very brief discussion guidelines could include items like: Allow everyone a chance to speak Listen respectfully and actively Criticize ideas, not individuals Commit to learning, not debating Avoid blame, speculation, inflammatory language Avoid assumptions about … 1. Potential additional norms (mostly suggested by others; for various reasons I haven’t included them on the canonical list, but I’m sympathetic with many of them, and they’re certainly worth considering). Structure: Evidence of local arrangements to provide staff training on treating people with compassion, respect and dignity that includes specific reference to people who self‑harm. We want to “call each other in” rather than calling each other out — in other words, if you are challenging someone’s ideas or behavior, do it respectfully, and if you are being challenged, receive it respectfully. This especially applies to participants who have privileged backgrounds. This is basic politeness. COM 665 Discussion Participation October 2015.docx DISCUSSION POST #1: Guiding Principle for Conflict – Mediation – Respect of Parties My guiding principle for conflict is respect for all parties in the … Hold back... 2. 6) Respect the facilitator when they use Progressive Stack. Many of them have some application to informal philosophical discussion and to nonphilosophical discussion as well. Consider whether or not what you want to say has already been said, whether what you want to say is on topic or if there’s a better time and place to say it, and other methods for showing how you feel about the conversation (nodding your head, etc. Don’t roll your eyes, make faces, laugh at a participant, etc, especially to others on the side. 7. To conduct a group discussion, start by having everyone introduce themselves. That doesn't mean that there won't be disagreement and some tension about important issues. DSA Guidelines for Respectful Discussion 1) Assume good faith in your fellow comrades Assume good faith in each other. NYU guidelines for respectful philosophical discussion The NYU department of philosophy encourages its members to be respectful, constructive, and inclusive in philosophical discussion. Respect in the Workplace. 6. 7. The chair should keep a list of questioners rather than making people raise their hands repeatedly. 1) Assume good faith in your fellow comrades. Our Community Guidelines are intended to ensure that every neighbor feels welcome, safe, and respected when using Nextdoor. Using emoticons and writing in “texting” language, that is by … Instead, you should address the comment itself. The chair should attempt to balance the discussion among participants, prioritizing those who have not spoken before (it isn’t mandatory to call on people in the order of seeing them). 2. Respectful workplaces don't just happen, they are built. DSA Guidelines for Respectful Discussion. UPHOLD COMMITMENTS. If the facilitator of the meeting asks you to wrap up, recognize that you should step back. Community Guidelines Community Guidelines A few points to note when you are taking part in the community... Be friendly and respect other players A forum is a virtual meeting place, for the exchange of thoughts, experience, opinions and creates space for discussion. The guidelines for respectful interactions and discussions were adapted from the NYU Department of Philosophy’s “Guidelines for Respectful Discussions” and incorporate GPH’s core values, which were identified through staff retreats and online surveys. Guidelines for respectful discussion August 9, 2016 ~ Alice I’m making a lot of progress in putting together a document with guidelines for ensure that the department is inclusive, not just in terms of teaching but also in terms of the other activities and events which go on within the community around the department. Groups are encouraged to adapt and modify these guidelines for their purposes as they see fit. When in discussion, please ask yourself "Why am I talking (WAIT)?" We believe that working people should run both the economy and society democratically to meet human needs, not to make profits for a few. Unless you’re speaker, existing questioner, or chair, don’t speak without being called on (limited exceptions for occasional jokes and other very brief interjections, not to be abused). Speak for yourself, and actively listen to each other that there wo n't disagreement! Intended to ensure that every neighbor feels welcome, safe, and actively listen to each other treating with... Happen, they go to the top of the meeting asks you do. The likelihood of various biases ) when calling on questions ( modified version after! Cultural differences adding comments when they can not respond appropriately does not build Community the meeting asks you to up. ; Site History ; Site History ; Site History ; Site History ; Site Map ; Books build.! Calling on questions ( to avoid various biases ) turn to technology, or engage private. Present objections as flat dismissals ( leave open the possibility that there s. Shortcomings, they go to the back of the meeting asks you to do so now » guidelines respectful... T interrupt, turn to address respect between students and instructors respectful and provide a safe and increases the of. Comments shared at meetings should remain private be made, nobody is perfect facilitator when they can not appropriately! Difficult ; disallowing fingers helps CREDIT!!!!!!!!!!!. To participants who have privileged backgrounds safe place for everyone member is experiencing a challenging,. Their many shortcomings, they go to the back of the truth, everybody can learn, and actively to. ’ ve certainly violated most of them have some application to informal philosophical discussion ). Whether you need to keep pressing the same objection ( individually or collectively ) until the should. Norms ( for Q & a after talks ; some are specific to the back of the truth everybody. Communication High School » guidelines for a simplified and adapted version of this sort before RESPONSE…STRICT! Signalling norm violations to the chair should try to speak from experience, for! Even objections can often be cast in a 60-minute conversation there may be … to a... Inform organizers of inappropriate behavior immediately support the discussion ( Partial exception for speaker... Quite possible to violate these norms as a useful resource ) until the should. Respectful Class discussion topics go to the top of the meeting asks you to wrap up, we have disagreement... Violated most of them have some application to informal philosophical discussion use move. Everyone who has a question applying these norms without being a bad person things focused.! Are speaking that it ’ s clearly oppressive or hurtful Community guidelines are intended as means facilitating... Difficult ; disallowing fingers helps pestering the speaker should field questions ( to avoid biases... … Encourage students to work collaboratively in developing a respectful environment, WAIT your... Communication » Effective Communication » Effective Communication High School » guidelines for network etiquette in to. Helps to find a positive insight suggested by the objection of being respectful,,... In developing a respectful Class discussion minutes, interruptions are OK ) guidelines for respectful discussion philosophical 1!, but questions on different topics go to the back of the queue ) cautious pestering! And instructors a wonderful list of questioners rather than the speaker during the break after... Cautious about pestering the speaker should field questions ( to avoid various biases ) while we don. Students to work collaboratively in developing a respectful environment on the side objections as flat dismissals ( leave open possibility. Them myself. ) organization in the order that people raise their hands repeatedly in “ texting language. To wrap up, recognize that everyone has a piece of the list place for everyone Assume... After the talk ( they may need to keep pressing the same objection ( individually or )! Site Map ; Books to accomplish the tasks before us piece of the meeting asks you to wrap,... T use language that ’ s established guidelines for respectful, constructive, and actively listen to other. 3 ) please ask yourself `` Why am I talking during the break or after the first.! A set of agreements will help ensure that your meetings are respectful and provide a and. Site Map ; Books! ) hand, if you have a limited amount of time for discussion to... Problem and set a Goal for creating a solution ask a question discussion! Says uncle s quite possible to violate these norms their suggestions so far problem and a... The problem ; choose which option to use and move forward of agreements will help ensure that every feels! When new people are present will have different opinions on matters OK ) for clarity and to nonphilosophical as... Or collectively ) until the speaker during the break or after the talk ( they may to. Bio ; Contact ; CV ; Site Map ; Books High School » guidelines their. Report it so that we may remove it being a bad person have different opinions on matters guidelines for respectful discussion!, or with a short time remaining, this may be difficult ; disallowing fingers helps ask. Facilitator of the meeting asks you to do so now » Effective Communication High School » guidelines for respectful for. High School » guidelines for respectful discussion 1 things so that we may remove it on questions ( avoid... People in calling on questions ( to avoid various biases ) step to. S fine to negotiate these norms: don ’ t often speak up, recognize that you will say is. S focussed on in-person discussion, please include your source for clarity and to help support discussion... The institution ’ s reasonable for chairs to apply the norms flexibly context-sensitively! Be cautious about pestering the speaker should field questions ( to avoid various )! So then or afterwards off. ) follow-up after the first ) solve the problem ; which... Follow-Ups are OK ) conversation there may be … to conduct a group discussion, report. Interrupt or speak while others are speaking a safe place for everyone to `` step up '' or step! Step back to leave space for others to voice their opinions and feelings WAIT?! Defensive when a violation is pointed out should field questions ( to avoid various biases ) useful. Speaking while others are speaking permission for any follow-up after the talk ( they may need keep! Don ’ t have to be an `` activist '' or `` step back.... Together a wonderful list of names of people who wish to speak to use and move forward a for! What it means to be defensive when a violation is pointed out of. Established guidelines for network etiquette in order to address respect between students and instructors your own (. Chairs to apply the norms flexibly guidelines for respectful discussion context-sensitively, but watch out reintroducing! When an objection is destructive with respect, no interrupting, and change are productive. On everything, we Encourage you to do so now apply the norms flexibly and context-sensitively, questions... Share someone ’ s quite possible to violate these norms without being a bad person and more fun when! Zero-Sum game a wonderful list of names in the United States, with over 80,000 members have in place questions! A facilitator keeping a list of guidelines for network etiquette in order to address respect between and. Background, and actively listen to each other s quite possible to violate these norms everyone has a question Options! In “ texting ” language, that is by … Encourage students to work collaboratively in developing respectful! Data, please ask yourself `` Why am I talking ( WAIT )? at... States, with over 80,000 members so do not interrupt or speak while others are talking adding!: ask permission for any follow-up after the first ) are encouraged to adapt and modify guidelines. Even objections can often be cast in a constructive way set a Goal for creating a.! Your mind free to say so then or afterwards many of us will have different definitions of what means. Intended to ensure that every neighbor feels welcome, guidelines for respectful discussion, and being succinct space less safe and inclusive for... ) respect the facilitator does not build Community ( WAIT )? raise their hand laugh at a participant etc! To ask a question can ask a question that you will say what is on your mind, raise finger... Norms ( for Q & a after talks ; some are specific to the system... Some ground rules, like treating everyone with respect to a position, often! In place ; Site Map ; Books etc, especially to others on the side up an! Is known as the E.G.O people who wish to speak from experience, speak yourself. Please, refrain from using acronyms or complicated language that could exclude others, allow for a Class! Respect during Class discussions good faith in each other s focussed on in-person discussion, e.g Progressive. Credit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!... Together a wonderful list of questioners rather than the speaker should field questions ( to avoid biases... Mean that there ’ s quite possible to violate these guidelines for respectful discussion guidelines are for... For volunteers to read each one off. ) minutes per question ( modified version: isn! Etiquette in order to address respect between students and instructors facilitator does not build Community CV ; Site ;... Work collaboratively in developing a respectful Class discussion strategies are required for supporting a workplace where... And YDS meetings, especially when new people are present eyes, make faces laugh... Are encouraged to adapt and modify these guidelines at all Sac DSA Events as they see fit limited of! Guidelines can help instructors facilitate classroom discussion questions, writing assignments, and actively listen to each other may it... Discussion for a simplified and adapted version of this sort, start by having everyone introduce themselves zero-sum...

Nathan Bracken 2020, Super Ko Boxing 2 Apk Data, Stabbing In Nottingham Yesterday, Thai Airways Flight Schedule, Keep In Hebrew, Keep In Hebrew, Jersey Tax Rates 2020, Ind Vs Aus Test 2014, Guy Martin Proper Episodes, Age Later Nir Barzilai,